Do you agree with this?? Why?
So I answered with the following profundity
scribble1 says:"Art is a con game that_________" scribble1
I'm holding Weegee 'Masters of photography' by Aperture. On the dust jacket is Weegee's most famous masterpiece "The Critic" (Google it now to appreciate the story )
Weegee was drinking with a buddy when they ran out of money. In the bar there was a very drunk and loud woman. Weegee and buddy bundle woman in a taxi and go to Opera House. Buddy who is holding the woman so she doesn't fall flat on her face steps out of the picture when Weegee signals he has his picture in the viewfinder. Weegee take picture to tabloid and sells it for $20--big money those days. Drunk woman has a triple whiskey. Weegee and buddy have a lets-invite-everybody party.
Buddy tells story when Weegee becomes famous. No historical record of what the woman said when she woke up in the morning and found "The Critic" on the front page of the biggest tabloid in NY.
How do I know "The Critic" is a masterpiece and not just another tabloid stunt? Aperture told me. Front dust cover, told me. And they are the "experts"
Moral of the story. " Art lies." And if the lies are amusing and contain a dash of genius and some "expert" has a reason to promote the lie, they may survive to become a "masterpiece".
And when I went to Valeriee's photostream I discovered what I should have suspected but didn't. She was bright high school student with a paper to write and was looking around for ideas. So I commented with:
Yes, you uncovered my fiendish plot :) Thanks so much for your story, that was really interesting. And that's an excellent point you bring up there... honestly I feel like it's a status thing more than an appreciation of the art. Having the real deal after putting out 1.2 mil is more impressive than a printing copy from online. I totally don't understand why people spend that kind of money that way when there are much more constructive things that can be done with it (especially in this unbalanced world). Purchases like that seem to me like a product of 'affluenza,' but that's just my opinion.
And my reply:
This is the image I was talking about. Dovima, the model, is wearing a Dior gown and the print was bought by the Dior fashion house so I assume they must have had a business reason for wanting it so badly. Still someone else who wasn't Dior had to have caught the "affluenza" bug (great word) to push the price to over a million bucks. So your opinion is valid.
My often given (and I suspect mostly ignored) advice I offer to young photographers is to buy a book on the history of photography. Any history, used, battered and cheap, as long as it is crammed full of pictures.
The idea is to use the pictures as a starting point for your own work. Given the zillions of images flooding the world it is highly unlikely that any of us will ever take a picture that even approaches truly original. In photography it is always theme and variation.
Even this iconic image wasn't truly original. According to the article I linked a Martin Munkacsi, who I never heard of, started the fashion trend that Avedon took up. So as soon as I finish this I'll google Munkacsi and see what he has worth imitating. Ain't the Internet wonderful?
I didn't remember Munkacsi's name. As soon as I pulled up a gallery of his images I recognized several. He's not well known but worth looking at.
And to semi repeat myself Ain't copy and paste wonderful. A few clicks and this post is almost written.
To push this blog in a new directions here is an example of what I was talking about--using what I found in a photo book as the starting point of a photo shoot.
I found this in 100 Photographs by John Szarkowski, a long time curator of the photography department of the Museum of Modern Art. It is Miss Grace by Clarence White, one of the best photographers in the photo-secession movement of the early 20th century
At the time Julie, my model from next door, was a freshman in high school. I asked her if she happened to own a white dress-- a garment found in many wardrobes back in Miss Grace's era but sparse in this era of jeans and t-shirts.
Knowing how Julie usually dressed I was expecting a "No" but I was wrong. Pushed in the back of her closet was the dress her mother had picked out for her 8th grade graduation. So we set up a photo shoot for Saturday afternoon.
Some shots we came up with:
This image almost made it into a juried show at the Overture Center. But since the other three images I submitted did hang on the wall, I could hardly complain. Julie was disappointed but the framed photo now is on the picture wall of her parent's house
Julie has an independent streak. I'd gone to the trouble of finding a book on chess and setting up the board to show the middle of a real game. She didn't like the arrangement and moved the pieces the way she liked them. Which would cause a chess player to look in bemusement--like two black bishops on the same color. I kept shooting away
In the middle of the shoot Julie told me she was tired of wearing the white dress and had a better costume in mind. She raided her mother's closet and came out wearing this. So I did end up with my "Miss Grace" image. Sort of anyway.